Days of Heaven (1978) is noted for its powerful (and Academy Award-winning) cinematography, and I must say, I have never seen wheat look so beautiful. And there was A LOT of wheat in those 94 minutes. The cinematography of Days of Heaven directs the film’s focus to the setting and environment of the film. The view occasionally sweeps across the landscape, but more often the camera lends its effect to a more stagnant feel, emphasizing the storyline of Bill, Abbey and Linda as they find themselves trapped in the wheat fields of their [supposedly] dying boss.
The story takes place in the Panhandle of Texas, but all of the exteriors were actually filmed in Canada (Wikipedia). There are a variety of shot lengths used, including extreme long shots, long shots, medium shots, and a few close-ups; however, the extreme long shots and long shots dominate. These images, those including characters and those of just landscape, are what remains in the viewers’ mind after the credits roll. This is in part due to the sheer proportion of landscape long shots to actor close-ups and partly due to the visual beauty and impact provided by these shots. Throughout the movie, the characters are often silhouetted against the farm landscape of rolling hills, vivid sunsets, and the iconic Victorian home of the landowner as it stands alone, looming impressively large in the midst of the vast, surrounding fields. The majority of the action is filmed at a camera angle that encompasses these landscapes; very few scenes take place indoors. The story of the evolving love between Bill and Abbey and Abbey and the dying boss essentially happens because of the wheat fields and is shaped by the characters’ experiences in the fields, making the indoors almost irrelevant and pointless. The end of the movie shows the characters after they have left the fields (Linda is sent to a ballet school and Abbey leaves on a train); the cinematography of theses scenes provides a contrast with muted, blue tones and a more urban landscape.
The tonalities of the cinematography consist of mainly warm, dusty colors. The warm reds and golds of the color palette are especially emphasized when the fields are burning and the golden wheat melts into orange flames against the red sky. The sharpest contrast in this film’s cinematography is found in these sequences, when the characters are silhouetted against the sky; otherwise, the contrast remains mostly balanced with the natural tones of the fields and dull colors of the worker’s clothes. There are also many scenes filmed in the natural light of dusk and sunset, lending to the rich tones and feel of the film. As a viewer, you become engulfed in the cinematography of the movie and can easily forget that you aren’t outside because the natural lighting of the film is so true and tangible.
Although the plot is important, it is interspersed amidst a cinematographic masterpiece. Dan Schneider explains in his movie review on CineScene.com, “Naturally, in a film like this, the what that happens is not as important as the how.” The storyline would be almost dispensable without the setting. The cinematography, however, could exist alone as a silent film. Besides environment and beauty, the fields present the hard work, isolation, and unpredictability of life, which are the central ideas of the film. A film without cinematography is like a camera without a lens; a film with sub-par cinematography is like leaving your camera on “Automatic” and using the flash at all the wrong moments. This film, however, uses the camera and lens to the full potential, creating a beautiful film with cinematography as the shining element.